Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpl6J3hD/Ex5_DLMMU04

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(0, XS) → nil
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(nil, XS) → nil
a__zip(X, nil) → nil
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__tail(cons(X, XS)) → mark(XS)
a__repItems(nil) → nil
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(0, XS) → nil
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(nil, XS) → nil
a__zip(X, nil) → nil
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__tail(cons(X, XS)) → mark(XS)
a__repItems(nil) → nil
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.

The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(0, XS) → nil
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(nil, XS) → nil
a__zip(X, nil) → nil
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__tail(cons(X, XS)) → mark(XS)
a__repItems(nil) → nil
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
The following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [15] because they are oriented strictly by a polynomial ordering:

a__zip(nil, XS) → nil
a__zip(X, nil) → nil

Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(a__incr(x₁)) = x₁
POL(a__oddNs) = 0
POL(a__pairNs) = 0
POL(a__repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__tail(x₁)) = x₁
POL(a__take(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(a__zip(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(incr(x₁)) = x₁
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(oddNs) = 0
POL(pair(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(pairNs) = 0
POL(repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tail(x₁)) = x₁
POL(take(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(zip(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + x₁ + x₂

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(0, XS) → nil
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__tail(cons(X, XS)) → mark(XS)
a__repItems(nil) → nil
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.

The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(0, XS) → nil
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__tail(cons(X, XS)) → mark(XS)
a__repItems(nil) → nil
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
The following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [15] because they are oriented strictly by a polynomial ordering:

a__take(0, XS) → nil

Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(a__incr(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__oddNs) = 0
POL(a__pairNs) = 0
POL(a__repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__tail(x₁)) = x₁
POL(a__take(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + x₁ + x₂
POL(a__zip(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(incr(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(oddNs) = 0
POL(pair(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(pairNs) = 0
POL(repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tail(x₁)) = x₁
POL(take(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + x₁ + x₂
POL(zip(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__tail(cons(X, XS)) → mark(XS)
a__repItems(nil) → nil
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.

The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__tail(cons(X, XS)) → mark(XS)
a__repItems(nil) → nil
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
The following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [15] because they are oriented strictly by a polynomial ordering:

a__repItems(nil) → nil

Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(a__incr(x₁)) = x₁
POL(a__oddNs) = 0
POL(a__pairNs) = 0
POL(a__repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__tail(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__take(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(a__zip(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(incr(x₁)) = x₁
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 2
POL(oddNs) = 0
POL(pair(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(pairNs) = 0
POL(repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tail(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(take(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(zip(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

            ↳ QTRS

              ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__tail(cons(X, XS)) → mark(XS)
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.

The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__tail(cons(X, XS)) → mark(XS)
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
The following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [15] because they are oriented strictly by a polynomial ordering:

a__tail(cons(X, XS)) → mark(XS)

Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(a__incr(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__oddNs) = 0
POL(a__pairNs) = 0
POL(a__repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__tail(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(a__take(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(a__zip(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(incr(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(oddNs) = 0
POL(pair(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(pairNs) = 0
POL(repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(tail(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(take(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(zip(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

            ↳ QTRS

              ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

                ↳ QTRS

                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(tail(X)) → A__TAIL(mark(X))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(repItems(X)) → A__REPITEMS(mark(X))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pairNs) → A__PAIRNS
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → A__ZIP(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(oddNs) → A__ODDNS
MARK(incr(X)) → A__INCR(mark(X))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → A__TAKE(mark(X1), mark(X2))
A__REPITEMS(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__ODDNS → A__PAIRNS
A__ZIP(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__ODDNS → A__INCR(a__pairNs)
A__ZIP(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → MARK(Y)
A__TAKE(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)
A__INCR(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

            ↳ QTRS

              ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

                ↳ QTRS

                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

                    ↳ QDP

                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(tail(X)) → A__TAIL(mark(X))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(repItems(X)) → A__REPITEMS(mark(X))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pairNs) → A__PAIRNS
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → A__ZIP(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(oddNs) → A__ODDNS
MARK(incr(X)) → A__INCR(mark(X))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → A__TAKE(mark(X1), mark(X2))
A__REPITEMS(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__ODDNS → A__PAIRNS
A__ZIP(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__ODDNS → A__INCR(a__pairNs)
A__ZIP(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → MARK(Y)
A__TAKE(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)
A__INCR(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 3 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

            ↳ QTRS

              ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

                ↳ QTRS

                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

                    ↳ QDP

                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                        ↳ QDP

                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(incr(X)) → A__INCR(mark(X))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → A__TAKE(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
A__REPITEMS(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(repItems(X)) → A__REPITEMS(mark(X))
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__ZIP(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__ODDNS → A__INCR(a__pairNs)
A__ZIP(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → A__ZIP(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
A__TAKE(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(oddNs) → A__ODDNS
A__INCR(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the rule removal processor [15] with the following polynomial ordering [25], at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
Strictly oriented dependency pairs:

MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
A__REPITEMS(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(repItems(X)) → A__REPITEMS(mark(X))

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(A__INCR(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(A__ODDNS) = 0
POL(A__REPITEMS(x₁)) = 1 + 2·x₁
POL(A__TAKE(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(A__ZIP(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__incr(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__oddNs) = 0
POL(a__pairNs) = 0
POL(a__repItems(x₁)) = 1 + 2·x₁
POL(a__tail(x₁)) = x₁
POL(a__take(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(a__zip(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(incr(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(oddNs) = 0
POL(pair(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(pairNs) = 0
POL(repItems(x₁)) = 1 + 2·x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tail(x₁)) = x₁
POL(take(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(zip(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + 2·x₂

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

            ↳ QTRS

              ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

                ↳ QTRS

                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

                    ↳ QDP

                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                        ↳ QDP

                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                            ↳ QDP

                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(incr(X)) → A__INCR(mark(X))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → A__TAKE(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__ZIP(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__ODDNS → A__INCR(a__pairNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__ZIP(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → A__ZIP(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
A__TAKE(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(oddNs) → A__ODDNS
A__INCR(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(A__INCR(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(A__ODDNS) = 0
POL(A__TAKE(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(A__ZIP(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__incr(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__oddNs) = 0
POL(a__pairNs) = 0
POL(a__repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__tail(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(a__take(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(a__zip(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(incr(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 1
POL(oddNs) = 0
POL(pair(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(pairNs) = 0
POL(repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(tail(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(take(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(zip(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

            ↳ QTRS

              ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

                ↳ QTRS

                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

                    ↳ QDP

                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                        ↳ QDP

                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                            ↳ QDP

                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                ↳ QDP

                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(incr(X)) → A__INCR(mark(X))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → A__TAKE(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__ZIP(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__ODDNS → A__INCR(a__pairNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__ZIP(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → A__ZIP(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
A__TAKE(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(oddNs) → A__ODDNS
A__INCR(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → A__ZIP(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(A__INCR(x₁)) = 2 + x₁
POL(A__ODDNS) = 2
POL(A__TAKE(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + x₁ + x₂
POL(A__ZIP(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + x₁ + x₂
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 2 + x₁
POL(a__incr(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__oddNs) = 0
POL(a__pairNs) = 0
POL(a__repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__tail(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__take(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(a__zip(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(incr(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(oddNs) = 0
POL(pair(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(pairNs) = 0
POL(repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tail(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(take(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(zip(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + x₁ + x₂

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

            ↳ QTRS

              ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

                ↳ QTRS

                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

                    ↳ QDP

                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                        ↳ QDP

                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                            ↳ QDP

                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                ↳ QDP

                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                    ↳ QDP

                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(incr(X)) → A__INCR(mark(X))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → A__TAKE(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__ZIP(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
A__ODDNS → A__INCR(a__pairNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__ZIP(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → MARK(Y)
A__TAKE(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(oddNs) → A__ODDNS
A__INCR(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

            ↳ QTRS

              ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

                ↳ QTRS

                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

                    ↳ QDP

                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                        ↳ QDP

                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                            ↳ QDP

                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                ↳ QDP

                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                    ↳ QDP

                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                        ↳ QDP

                                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(incr(X)) → A__INCR(mark(X))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → A__TAKE(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
A__ODDNS → A__INCR(a__pairNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__TAKE(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(oddNs) → A__ODDNS
A__INCR(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → A__TAKE(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(A__INCR(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(A__ODDNS) = 0
POL(A__TAKE(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(MARK(x₁)) = x₁
POL(a__incr(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__oddNs) = 0
POL(a__pairNs) = 0
POL(a__repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__tail(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__take(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(a__zip(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(incr(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(oddNs) = 0
POL(pair(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(pairNs) = 0
POL(repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(tail(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(take(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(zip(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

            ↳ QTRS

              ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

                ↳ QTRS

                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

                    ↳ QDP

                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                        ↳ QDP

                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                            ↳ QDP

                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                ↳ QDP

                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                    ↳ QDP

                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                        ↳ QDP

                                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(incr(X)) → A__INCR(mark(X))
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
A__ODDNS → A__INCR(a__pairNs)
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__TAKE(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)
MARK(oddNs) → A__ODDNS
A__INCR(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

            ↳ QTRS

              ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

                ↳ QTRS

                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

                    ↳ QDP

                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                        ↳ QDP

                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                            ↳ QDP

                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                ↳ QDP

                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                    ↳ QDP

                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                        ↳ QDP

                                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(incr(X)) → A__INCR(mark(X))
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
A__ODDNS → A__INCR(a__pairNs)
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(oddNs) → A__ODDNS
A__INCR(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

MARK(oddNs) → A__ODDNS

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(A__INCR(x₁)) = x₁
POL(A__ODDNS) = 2
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__incr(x₁)) = x₁
POL(a__oddNs) = 2
POL(a__pairNs) = 2
POL(a__repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(a__tail(x₁)) = x₁
POL(a__take(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(a__zip(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(incr(x₁)) = x₁
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(oddNs) = 2
POL(pair(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(pairNs) = 2
POL(repItems(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tail(x₁)) = x₁
POL(take(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(zip(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

            ↳ QTRS

              ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

                ↳ QTRS

                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

                    ↳ QDP

                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                        ↳ QDP

                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                            ↳ QDP

                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                ↳ QDP

                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                    ↳ QDP

                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                        ↳ QDP

                                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(incr(X)) → A__INCR(mark(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
A__ODDNS → A__INCR(a__pairNs)
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__INCR(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

            ↳ QTRS

              ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

                ↳ QTRS

                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

                    ↳ QDP

                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                        ↳ QDP

                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                            ↳ QDP

                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                ↳ QDP

                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                    ↳ QDP

                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                        ↳ QDP

                                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(incr(X)) → A__INCR(mark(X))
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__INCR(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(incr(X)) → A__INCR(mark(X))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__INCR(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(A__INCR(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = x₁
POL(a__incr(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(a__oddNs) = 1
POL(a__pairNs) = 0
POL(a__repItems(x₁)) = x₁
POL(a__tail(x₁)) = 0
POL(a__take(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(a__zip(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(incr(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(oddNs) = 1
POL(pair(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(pairNs) = 0
POL(repItems(x₁)) = x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tail(x₁)) = 0
POL(take(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(zip(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__pairNs → pairNs
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

            ↳ QTRS

              ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

                ↳ QTRS

                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

                    ↳ QDP

                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                        ↳ QDP

                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                            ↳ QDP

                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                ↳ QDP

                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                    ↳ QDP

                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                        ↳ QDP

                                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__INCR(cons(X, XS)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

            ↳ QTRS

              ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

                ↳ QTRS

                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

                    ↳ QDP

                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                        ↳ QDP

                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                            ↳ QDP

                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                ↳ QDP

                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                    ↳ QDP

                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                        ↳ QDP

                                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__pairNs → cons(0, incr(oddNs))
a__oddNs → a__incr(a__pairNs)
a__incr(cons(X, XS)) → cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS))
a__take(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), take(N, XS))
a__zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) → cons(pair(mark(X), mark(Y)), zip(XS, YS))
a__repItems(cons(X, XS)) → cons(mark(X), cons(X, repItems(XS)))
mark(pairNs) → a__pairNs
mark(incr(X)) → a__incr(mark(X))
mark(oddNs) → a__oddNs
mark(take(X1, X2)) → a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → a__zip(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tail(X)) → a__tail(mark(X))
mark(repItems(X)) → a__repItems(mark(X))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(mark(X1), X2)
mark(0) → 0
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(nil) → nil
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → pair(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__pairNs → pairNs
a__incr(X) → incr(X)
a__oddNs → oddNs
a__take(X1, X2) → take(X1, X2)
a__zip(X1, X2) → zip(X1, X2)
a__tail(X) → tail(X)
a__repItems(X) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [15] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its argument. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

        ↳ QTRS

          ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

            ↳ QTRS

              ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

                ↳ QTRS

                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

                    ↳ QDP

                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                        ↳ QDP

                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                            ↳ QDP

                              ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                ↳ QDP

                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                    ↳ QDP

                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                        ↳ QDP

                                          ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1